Answer:
The movement of the combinations, explained by your classmate, is presented in an equal way, which does not represent an opportunity cost. In order to be able to perceive a constant opportunity cost, the combinations should present different values, and the choice of one of them, would cause the loss of opportunity to submit to the results that would be obtained with the choice of the others. However, as all combinations are the same, choosing any one would give the same results.
Explanation:
A constant opportunity cost refers to the presentation of elements in a business that would happen differently from each other and that would present different profitable results in a constant and extended way, showing the value and benefits that each one has individually.
Religion because it is important nowadays
Identify problem
Gather info
Identify options
Evaluate options
Consider consequences
Choose the best option
Make a plan
Carry out plan
Evaluate how plan worked
I’m not really sure where Consider consequences goes but I’m pretty sure the rest are right. :)
If Sagan scored 1200 divide 980 divide by 100 =3 Andrea =27 so I think that Andrea has the most then sagan 3×9=27
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
The key word is simultaneously when it comes to parallel computing. Although the option <em>could </em>potentially be C, it's more likely to be A because it's "more right" in the words of my old English teacher. This is because A implies them working on it at the same time to reach the goal more effectively (another key word).
