1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lina2011 [118]
3 years ago
13

Deferring to another court’s decision on a prior matter in order to decide on a new controversy is known as:

Law
2 answers:
mamaluj [8]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

American courts follow the doctrine of stare decisis, which requires them to defer to previous cases on similar issues. Such cases are referred to as "precedents." Part I of this Commentary will provide an overview of precedent's role in the American legal system.

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

xenn [34]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. Stare decisis requires that cases follow the precedents of other similar cases in similar jurisdictions.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
A city council is a ___________ law-making body.<br><br> national<br> state<br> local
aksik [14]

Answer:

Local

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How can Congress check the President?
Phoenix [80]

mental you you are in the world You you

are biggest mental

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The board nursing will typically use mediation to resolve first instances of relatively minor violations
butalik [34]

It is a true statement that the board nursing will typically use mediation to resolve first instances of relatively minor violations.

<h3>What is a mediation?</h3>

This refers to an interactive process whereby a third party helps in resolving conflict between disputing parties through the use of specialized communication.

Therefore, that act of mediating by the board will help to resolve first instances of relatively minor violations.

Read more about mediation

<em>brainly.com/question/25850228</em>

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Why are the rules of the economic system important?​
andrezito [222]

1) a situation in which human wants are greater than the capacity of available resources to provide for those wants

2)a situation in which a resource has more than one valuable use

6 0
3 years ago
If you were a member of the Supreme Court what law would you rule as unconstitutional? What basis would you use to support your
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

Explanation:

The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.

However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.

When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.

Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why would a city want to annex a suburban neighborhood?
    12·2 answers
  • in Philadelphia during the 1980s, white gamblers were forced to pay protection money to operate in the black neighborhoods. True
    11·1 answer
  • A feature of decisional law in common law systems which says that, a court, in making a decision, should follow the rulings of p
    8·1 answer
  • Michael Manin, an airline pilot, was twice convicted of disorderly conduct, a minor misdemeanor. To renew his flight certificati
    15·1 answer
  • 3 Points<br> Which of the following is a right of employees in the United States?
    12·1 answer
  • A contract was made for 125 bales of cotton to arrive on a ship named "Peerless" from Bombay. Unbeknownst to either party to the
    15·1 answer
  • According to Prakash, why must some people wait months to diagnose why they are sick? What does the traditional microscope have
    7·2 answers
  • Differential opportunity theory argues that we all have the same opportunity to commit crimes, indicating that it is something a
    12·1 answer
  • During the lunch hour at school a group of five boys from Miss Jones' home room visited a nearby lunch wagon
    13·1 answer
  • What country has the most animal endangerment? and what governor or non-governor organisation is helping animal endangerment?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!