Answer:
inspirational
Explanation:
Because he used inspirational tone in order to unite and rally the common person in his nation.
Because they are!!!
It sometimes is for the right reason, but I do 100% agree that it does seem selfish, I would HATE to have to do that!
Nabokov organized his essay in an exceedingly typical manner; he states his plan then uses proof to support it. He additionally explains his read on what makes a decent author initial then what makes a decent reader. This is smart as a result of one should initial perceive the author before understanding the reader. He uses samples of what created a decent author to clarify what would create a decent reader. “The writer is the initial man to mop it and to form the natural objects it contains (…) The panting and happy reader, and there they spontaneously embrace and are linked forever if the book lasts forever.” This possibly implies that a good author makes a cheerful reader. so a cheerful reader is one that has understood the piece clearly, creating them a good reader. author then offers his definition of literature before closing the essay, giving the reader that last little bit of information that wraps literature, the reader, and also the author all at once, “To the story teller we turn for entertainment, for mental excitement of the simplest kind, for emotional participation,for the pleasure of traveling in some remote region in space or time.”
The characteristics listed in the table describes:
- A Federalist is a person that is a strong believer in the federal government of the United States. Such a person believes in a powerful central government which would have the ability to adequately control the other states.
- A Federalist is of the opinion that the Bill of Rights is not needed, that the Separation of powers is necessary to protect the people, and that no branch of government controls the other as a result of checks and balances.
- Conversely,an Anti-Federalist would be of the opinion that a bill of rights is needed and that the central government should not have all the power.
- Therefore, the correct answer is option C
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/18278815
Answer:
The reason why I personally disagree with this statement is that Mark Antony's speech wasn’t very good and the crowd was just written by Shakespeare to be suddenly convinced.
Explanation:
if you were to remove the easily swayed audience and replace it with a more objective audience,Mark Antony's speech would not still stand up as a convincing work of rhetoric.
The reason why I personally disagree with this statement is that Mark Antony's speech wasn’t very good and the crowd was just written by Shakespeare to be suddenly convinced. So I feel if the crowd were actually normal people the story could be different they wouldn’t be definitely so .
