Explanation:
Given the scope of violence in Mexico, calculating its economic impact is necessary to assess the financial burden it places on the country's society.
According to the 2018 Mexico Peace Index (MPI), the cost of violence in Mexico in 2017 was 4.72 trillion pesos (US $249 billion).
This is the equivalent of 21% of the country's gross domestic product.
Given the high cost of violence, Mexico's investment in its prevention is surprisingly low.
In 2017, the federal government set aside only 1% of GDP for public order and safety expenditures.
Spanish:
Dado el alcance de la violencia en México, el cálculo de su impacto económico es necesario para evaluar la carga financiera que representa para la sociedad del país.
Según el Índice de Paz de México (IPM) 2018, el costo de la violencia en México en 2017 fue de 4.72 mil millones de pesos (US $ 249 mil millones).
Esto es equivalente al 21% del producto interno bruto del país.
Dado el alto costo de la violencia, la inversión de México en su prevención es sorprendentemente baja.
En 2017, el gobierno federal reservó solo el 1% del PIB para los gastos de orden público y de seguridad.
Well, I am pretty sure that the correct answers will be C and D. This is because when people had traveled with Marco Polo they had seen all of the opportunity that they were missing when they weren't trading what they had traded with the Orient when they first started. The Crusades influenced a lot of people to start trading with others I personally think that they forced some people to do it but we don't know that for sure.
I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest
Answer:
A. address the opposition is the correct answer.
Explanation:
