Answer: A feudal system created on the ruins of slavery.
Explanation:
The feudal system is a social system that was in place during the Middle Ages. This system consisted of landowners, respectively (feudal lords), and tenants (feudal) land that the feudal lords leased. This system was suitable for landowners. Namely, it was the peasants who cultivated the ground and gave most of the income to the landlord; for them, it was generally smaller, the amount that the peasant could survive. In these circumstances, it was the serfs who endured the complete system, and often there were riots, which were largely suppressed. We can, therefore, conclude that the peasant, unlike the feudal lord, was not privileged and in any way protected by the system.
Answer:
I'll give you a couple of ideas!
1. Problem: You are a detective trying to solve a case that has been cold for years. You have eliminated all but two suspects. Which one is the right one?
Solution: You decide to look carefully at the evidence and *gasp* one piece of evidence leads you to the right one!
2. Problem: You are a mage about to partake in a quest against a terrible group of goblins with your party. If only you can find your darn wizarding staff!
Solution: After hours of searching, you realize that it was in your hand the whole time.
I don't know if you prefer any of these topics, and I would be happy to give you more prompts!
The effect today's readers have on reading science fiction stories is, they are less likely to believe the stories could be true.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
This is an era of technology and advancement. If we talk about the readers of previous era, they couldn’t really differentiate between the real ones and the unreal ones while reading stories.
But that’s not the case today, and that’s mainly because almost each one of us try to reason everything based on facts and knowledge.
We’ve sources to get to known about the genuineness of particular books and stories. So today when readers read science fiction stories they’re less likely to believe it because fiction stories in itself are not true.
C) But even this is admitting more than is true, for I answer roundly, that America would have flourished as much, and probably much more, had no European power had anything to do with her. thus option C is correct.
<h3>Why British rule of American colonies?</h3>
Although each colony had its own government, the British king maintained power over them. Many colonists were irate by the 1770s because they lacked self-government. This implied that they were unable to rule themselves and establish their own rules. The king demanded that they pay enormous taxes.
According to Paine's claim in Option C, America would have actually been better off if it had not been under British rule. According to him, America's progress and ability to prosper even more were really hampered by its rule by the British. Both options A and B make the case that America needs Britain to succeed. Option A claims that for America to be happy, a relationship with Britain is crucial. America is compared to a child in Option B. According to this, a child should never consume meat if they can get by on milk alone. America should therefore just require Britain. Although Paine evidently finds this absurd, the premise does not support the claim.
Learn more about British rule here:
brainly.com/question/3203295
#SPJ1
A would be the correct answer
