Jonas thinks about his experience on the playing field after watching his father release the baby because it was another instance of the community members not truly grasping the concept of death. His friends couldn’t understand that war was a serious matter because it involved suffering and death because they couldn’t understand why those were so bad, and his father couldn’t understand that the death of the baby just because it was slightly smaller than its twin was significant because he couldn’t understand the grave (pun unintended) significance of death. Jonas, however, can, as a result of his experiences of being a Receiver.
Answer:
The statement that best describes the change in Neto since the beginning of the story is that <u>Neto realizes that quitting the football team is not an effective way of taking a stand against racism.</u>
Explanation:
From the excerpt of "It's Our World, Too!: Young People Who Are Making a Difference.", a number of football players decided to quit the football team by handing over their football uniforms and pads and telling their coach they were leaving because of the racial abuse they faced but the coach tried to let them know that if they quit football, it would only make matters worse because the fans would call them losers and quitters and the racists would have won.
Answer: A rebuttal that acknowledges the opposition's point and uses clever words to insult it.
Explanation: Facts are effective but using insults does nothing. Insults do not prove a pint while as facts do. Not a good explanation sorry.
The option that best describes the use of rhetorical elements in the passage is the following:
B. Loaded language appeals to the audience's emotions.
Loaded language is the use of words that have strong connotations with the purpose of evoking feelings and emotions in the audience.
The author of the passage we are analyzing here uses loaded language when discussing the use of pesticides and the adaption and evolution of insects.
Words such as "war", "violent crossfire", "deadlier", and "triumphant vindication" help depict a horrible image of destruction. It sounds as if the author is describing a battle rather than the use of pesticides.
The author's intention is precisely that: to associate war and pesticides. That way, she can evoke certain emotions in her audience.
<u>No one likes war, killing, and death</u>. Thus, if that is what pesticides mean, <u>no one will like them either.</u>
Learn more about the topic here:
brainly.com/question/18641687
