There are three ways to separate a run-on sentence: use a semicolon, use a comma and a conjunction, or put a period and capitalize the first letter in the next word. In this case, we have to do the final option, because we have to make two separate sentences; the other options will make a compound sentence.
1. Queen Elizabeth I knighted Raleigh, and he was appointed captain of the Queen's guard. He later set sail on an unsuccessful search of El Dorado, the legendary city of gold.
In this case, we put a period after 'guard' and capitalize the 'h' in 'he' because that is the point where the sentence can be separated into two complete sentences.
2. Queen Elizabeth liked Raleigh, however, her successor, King James I, did not. In 1603, he was accused of plotting against the king and sentenced to death, but only served 12 years.
We separate this sentence between 'not' and 'in' for the same reasons that we separated the first. That is the part of the sentence where it can be separated into two sentences that function on their own.
Hope this helps!
Influxes of Asian and African americans
Answer:
Montezuma "sorry if its wrong"
Explanation:
As for the article I found this source: http://revistascientificas.udg.mx/index.php/MYN/article/view/6646/6179
To achieve the summary, you should at least read some part of the article and briefly explain how they identify that efficiency, responsiveness, flexibility, quality of food and quality in the process, and deterministic and business models are those that are often used to measure the performance of a supply chain. (at least one of them)
The supply chain can be defined as a network of independent organizations and connected with mutual work and cooperation between them in order to control, manage and improve the flow of materials and information from the supplier to the consumed. The emphasis on measuring the performance and efficiency of supply chains in order to identify in what or what links are the problems and how to solve them.
If you need more help ask me! Hope it helped
Answer:
c.) hawthorne effect
Explanation:
The Hawthorne effect is regarded as the phenomenon in which the subjects in behavioral studies tend to change their performance in response to being observed.
It is always counter productive in terms of result because it is hard to study when results are biased, the participants knew they were being studied.
Due to the individuals knowledge that they are being studied, most times it produces not exactly the result it should.
