La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no anexaste opciones o incisos para responder, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
Decidió fundar en 1912 el Partido Obrero Socialista (POS). Dicha organización surgió en el norte salitrero y se expandió por las principales ciudades del país.
Estamos hablando de Luis Emilio Recabarren. Él fue el fundador del Partido Obrero Socialista (POS) en 1912.
Con el respaldo de los llamados obreros salitreros que buscaban una mejor alternativa que la propuesta del Partido Demócrata, Luis Emilio Recabarren decide fundar este importante partido de izquierda en 1912,
Como un partido de izquierda sólido, la clase trabajadora y obrera de Chile pronto se identificó con la plataforma de este partido que buscaba dignificar la presencia del trabajador chileno en el país, y exigía un trato acorde e igualitario para la clase trabajadora.
False I think it was the beggininf of it
Answer:
An important philosophical idea during the Enlightenment was that ordinary people should be able to pursue greater opportunities.
Explanation:
The Enlightenment was a period of great change in Europe and the United States in scientific practices and thinking that began in the late 17th century in the wake of the scientific revolution in the late Middle Ages. The Enlightenment lasted for about a century, and was characterized by the new ideas and discoveries that emerged during this period, which unveiled many things that had previously been incomprehensible to man. The Enlightenment was therefore a period of great human knowledge. This knowledge came about because man increasingly used scientific methods based on reason and realism rather than belief in supernatural forces or other babblings. The Christian Church was increasingly criticized after the new sciences and practices gave rise to a secular worldview.
Answer:
Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.
At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:
the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents
attributing false conclusions to books and sources
manipulating statistical data
deliberately mis-translating texts
This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.
