I would guess it would be around 20% so, 4/5ths
Amanda’s understanding of these said chapters are of not great quantity. Therefore, she may believe she understands the context but it misinterpreting it.
Answer:
Larina's experience best illustrates overconfidence.
Explanation:
Confidence is an individual's belief that he/she can have faith in something or someone.
Overconfidence is having an excessive confidence, which can often be negative.
In this case, we can see Larina is being overconfident, thinking she will never eat any junk food by the vending machines even though she does in the end.
The answer is "adaptive defense mechanisms".
For a significant number of us, any circumstance that brings vulnerability triggers an oblivious defensive measure that enables us to adapt to unsavory feelings. What's more, for the time being, numerous mechanisms can be adaptive. We don't stay. We don't state or accomplish something with conceivably harming implications. We keep ourselves in a superior state.
The answer is: [B]: "False".
______________________________________________________
Note: An "indictment" does have to involve any type of jury, or even any crime serious enough to be handled at the "grand jury level". An "indictment", or being charged with an offense, may be made by a prosecutor by a court even at the local county level—and SOMETIMES even when no "arrest" has ever been made.
_____________________________________________________