11. mosquitos or mosquitoes
12.sopranos
13. echos or echoes
14.mice
15.Heroes
16.children
17.Oxen
18.thousand
19.t's
20.shelves
21.beliefs
22.cries
23.monkeys
24.father-in-law
25.sheep
26.pianos
27.spoonfuls
28 eskimos
29.knives
30.clutches
31.radios
32.potatoes
33.lasses
34.altos
35.and
36.babies
37.chefs
38.arpeggios
39.pulleys
40.waxes
41.lunches
42.counties
43. deer
44.boys
45.women
46.men-at-arms
47.dragonflies
48.benches
49.grasses
50.sailfishes
Answer:
1. very, i was very exhausted for the day's work
Explanation:
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
What are the main points of the argument??????
Answer:
All members of the Council look the same.
Next part:
It contrasts uniform society with Equality 7-2521’s vivid thoughts and feelings.
