What does this scene tell you about the protest movement as a whole? I will give an brainlist.

History

2 answers:

WARRIOR [948]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

it pretty bad as a whole

Explanation:

sometimes if it's a peaceful protest then it will be less likely to cause any thing like riots and stuff but as seen on the picture which looks like a newspaper clipping but when you ate protests waving weapons and threatening to harm other people especially innocent who just got caught up in the protest and end up getting hurt... so I wouldn't say all protests are bad depends on the reason why they do it but i guess as a whole i can see how people would say that they are dangerous and a danger to society.

hope this helps

miskamm [114]2 years ago

7 0

The scene makes the humanity cry about the actions among protestants and police or armed forces.

Protest is good and in democracy everyone has right to protest
But protest should be peace ful that armed forces are not required.
If violation happens armed forces are not responsible for hampering human rights

You might be interested in

Which of the following pleoples are believed to have established the world first empire

Tomtit [17]

The Rome empire was the first believed empire to exist

3 0

3 years ago

What is the importance of each stage of the Stone Age and the Metal Age in the cultivation of

Charra [1.4K]

Answer:

Implications for future research and clinical practice are discussed. Proposing that Asian Americans may have an important ethnic identity does not diminish the Subscales, Asian American Race-Related Stress Inventory, and Age Among Asian

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Lincoln’s focus in the Gettysburg Address was to

timofeeve [1]

<span>d) illustrate the importance of the Union and freedom.</span>

6 0

4 years ago

SOMEONE PLEASE HELP 40 POINTS

irinina [24]

Three major<span> religious groups all claimed Jerusalem, in the land of Palestine, as their holy city. To Jews: *Abraham was given this land by God. To Muslims: *Abraham was given this land by God. Did that help</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Why did the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise involve so much debate and discussion at the

const2013 [10]

Answer:

The 3/5ths compromise said that 3/5ths of all slaves would count as free white men for the state population count. This was very unfair as most northern states had very little slaves compared to the Southern states. More people counting towards a states population meant more people representing that state in congress. The great compromise stated that the lower house's number of reps would be based on population of a state and the upper house would be based on equal representation for each state. The northern states didn't like this as they had less people in their states and wanted equal representation so that they wouldn't always be outnumbered by the southern states. The Southern states wanted the opposite.

8 0

3 years ago