Few people doubted his legitimacy. Legitimacy in this issue isn't characterized by the mainstream vote, vote tallies, our outrage or individuals quibbling about how the procedure turned out badly. It's characterized by a legitimate procedure that — regardless of the possibility that we contend about regardless of whether the Supreme Court settled on the morally remedy choice—was lawful and inside their domain. He promised of office, the Congress and Executive branch perceived that and hence he was the true blue POTUS. Suppositions on this issue are as unessential as sentiments on the presence of gravity.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
I think this shows how this was a failed version of democracy as the people that revolted were not heard and not pleased. Even though in france and Americas case there revolutions were not really just, it shows that the country representing them failed to please the people.
His soilders were tired and refused to go father many shoulders ended up dying of heat.
