Answer:
The Sea Peoples terrorized Egypt and the Mediterranean during the Bronze Age, but their identity and origins remain mysterious to this day.
Explanation:
More than 2,000 years before the Vikings first set sail from modern-day Scandinavia to plague the people of Europe, the great empires of the ancient world faced a terrifying seafaring enemy of their own — one that remains almost a complete mystery to this day.
“They came from the sea in their warships and none could stand against them,” ominously proclaimed one inscription written in the 13th century B.C. and later found at the Egyptian city of Tanis.
They were the Sea Peoples, the modern name given to the naval warriors who reportedly wreaked havoc upon the Mediterranean time again between the approximate years of 1400 B.C. and 1000 B.C. but whose identity and origins are largely shrouded in mystery.
The Umayyads were the first Muslim dynasty—that is, they were the first rulers of the Islamic Empire to pass down power within their family. Under their rule, which lasted from 661 to 750 AD, the early Islamic community was transformed into the most powerful empire of the day. In many ways, the Umayyads defined how an Islamic Empire would be ruled. Nonetheless, their lack of descent from Muhammad, their controversial practice of handing down power from father to son, and their mistreatment of non-Arab Muslims made them a controversial dynasty, a topic of debate among Muslims even to this day, and ultimately led to their fall.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
False. According to Roman law, slaves were considered only as property for instance.
The group that would have been least likely to have objected to the circumstances described in the excerpt would be social Darwinists.
<h3>What is Social Darwinism?</h3>
This refers to the school of thought that life is all about the battle of the fittest and the strongest survive.
Hence, we can see that from the given excerpt, there is the use of narration to show that the strong eat the weak and while this would have been distasteful to some, social Darwinists would not have objected.
Read more about social Darwinism here:
brainly.com/question/1385801
#SPJ1
