The reason why the Fugitive Slave Law and the Dred Scott decision made Black Abolitionists take more direct action against slavery because it meant that those who escaped slavery were at risk of being taken back.
<h3>How did Abolitionists react to the Fugitive slave law?</h3><h3 />
When the Fugitive Slave Law was passed, Black Abolitionists were outraged because it meant that people who escaped slavery in the South, could be captured from the North and taken back to slavery.
This was also the case with the Dred Scott decision which ruled that Black people could not sue for their freedom. Black Abolitionists then engaged in more direct action against slavery to ensure that people who escaped slavery would be free forever.
Find out more on the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 at brainly.com/question/16683622
#SPJ1
Poland, Germany, Hungary, Czechoslovakia (now Czech Republic and Slovakia) and basically all of Eastern Europe in the Eastern Bloc
Hey! This isn’t a question however good luck getting your work done!
It was primarily "<span>Rome and Carthage </span>" that fought in the Punic Wars, although it should be noted that there were other, smaller fighting forces involved as well.
Answer:
The two armies met at Stamford Bridge, just outside York, on 25 September 1066. It was a bloody battle and one in which Harold's army (the Saxons) broke through the Viking invaders front line to go on and win the battle. ... The Vikings didn't know what hit them. Harold's men killed Harald Hardrada and Tostig.
Explanation:
