1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rainbow [258]
3 years ago
7

PLEASE HELP!!! How did secular rulers challenged papacy authority?

History
2 answers:
kodGreya [7K]3 years ago
8 0
Hi!

With the inclusion of secular rulers, the papal did face some challenges. These secular rulers campaigned with an anti-papal message, which did present challenges for the Pope.

Secular rulers also established a General Council which worked towards monitoring the Pope's actions, and stepping in when necessary. 

Hopefully, this helps! =)
ElenaW [278]3 years ago
7 0
In the 14th and 15th centuries, secular rulers challenged papal authority through an anti-papal campaign (Unam Sanctum) and installing a General Council to regulate the Pope's actions.
You might be interested in
Who was the 33 president
N76 [4]

Harry S Truman is your answer

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
16. Consumers waiting in long lines for a new product is an example of
LekaFEV [45]
The answer is D. Scarcity
8 0
4 years ago
One effect of the Dawes act was?
umka2103 [35]
One effect was selling Native Americans property.
7 0
4 years ago
Write a paragraph on How Franklin D. Rooseveltt was elected 4 times.
In-s [12.5K]

On November 5, 1940 Franklin D. Roosevelt broke a long-held precedent—one that started with George Washington—when he became the first president elected to a third term. Roosevelt would go on to vie for, and win, yet a fourth term, taking office again on January 20, 1945.

FDR was the first, and last, president to win more than two consecutive presidential elections and his exclusive four terms were in part a consequence of timing. His election for a third term took place as the United States remained in the throes of the Great Depression and World War II had just begun. While multiple presidents had sought third terms before, the instability of the times allowed FDR to make a strong case for stability.

“You have economic-domestic issues and you have foreign policy with the outbreak of World War II in 1939,” says Barbara Perry, professor and director of presidential studies at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center. “And then you have his own political viability—he had won the 1936 election with more than two-thirds of the popular vote.”

Eventually U.S. lawmakers pushed back, arguing that term limits were necessary to keep abuse of power in check. Two years after FDR’s death, Congress passed the 22nd Amendment, limiting presidents to two terms. Then amendment was then ratified in 1951.

At the time of FDR’s third presidential run, however, “There was nothing but precedent standing in his way,” says Perry. “But, still, precedent, especially as it relates to the presidency, can be pretty powerful.”

Other U.S. Presidents Who Tried and Failed to Win a Consecutive Third Term

According to the National Constitution Center, most of the framers of the Constitution were against term limits, and, although amendments seeking to enforce them were proposed some 200 times between 1796 and 1940 without being adopted, most two-term presidents followed Washington’s precedent in not seeking reelection for a third time.

Still, some had tried. Ulysses S. Grant lost a third campaign in 1880, when James Garfield clinched the Republican nomination. Theodore Roosevelt lost his bid at a third nonconsecutive term in 1912 to William Howard Taft (he had previously served out the remainder of President William McKinley's term and then won reelection). And Woodrow Wilson lost the Democratic nomination in 1920. Harry Truman, who succeeded FDR after his death, was president when the 22nd Amendment passed and so was exempt from the new rule. Truman campaigned for a third term in 1952, but withdrew after losing in the New Hampshire primary.

Roosevelt’s campaign for a third term took place as the United States had not yet entered World War II, and the president was still trying to hold the line in an isolationist pattern.

“He was trying to guide us along to try to keep Britain afloat with things like lend-lease,” Perry says. “That obviously was preying on his mind and he didn’t think that the U.S. should ‘change horses in midstream’ as this war was building towards what he knew would eventually be our full-fledged intervention in both the European and Pacific theaters.”

Roosevelt’s defeat of Republican challenger Governor Alf Landon of Kansas was a rout—the fourth-largest electoral vote margin ever. His 1940 win against Republican businessman Wendell Willkie wasn’t quite as impressive, but he still won 55 percent of the popular vote, and took the electoral vote 449 to 82.

Republicans Led the Drive for Presidential Term Limits

This photograph of Franklin D. Roosevelt seated at his desk was the last color image of him before the announcement of his death.

Bettmann Archive/Getty Images

Of course, not everyone was on Roosevelt’s side. The National Constitution Center notes that his decision to run for a third term resulted in key Democratic supporters and advisors leaving his campaign.

Some political buttons from the time read “FDR Out at Third,” and Perry notes that despite his popularity, one-third of Americans, particularly business people and those with means, still voted against him. They argued he was taking America down the road of socialism.

“Famously, there were people who would refuse to speak of him by name and would call him ‘That Man,’” Perry says. “But he knew the popular vote and the electoral vote were on his side. He wanted to see us through the two greatest catastrophes of the 20th century and he succeeded.”

Term Limits Were Set to Guard Against Tyrannical Rule

In 1944, according to the National Constitution Center, term-limit talk again came into focus. Republicans were at the forefront of the movement, though many Democrats agreed with the eight-year precedent set by Washington to guard against tyrannical rule.

“Four terms or 16 years is the most dangerous threat to our freedom ever proposed,” Thomas Dewey, Roosevelt’s Republican opponent, said in a 1944 speech.

4 0
3 years ago
Why did England NOT give the United States New Orleans and Florida when they gave all land east of the Mississippi River in the
Keith_Richards [23]

Hello! This be your answer.

D. They wanted to continue to have a foothold in the Americas.

Be your answer.

Hope this helped! :)


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A parliamentary system experiences fewer conflicts between the executive branch and the legislative branch than does a president
    6·2 answers
  • The Democratic People's Republic of Korea could BEST be described as which of these?
    7·2 answers
  • Describe the military and cultural factors that led to the Mongol conquests of China and the Muslim kingdoms. Include what you r
    8·1 answer
  • (HELP ASAP!!!) why did daoists argue against confucianism?
    9·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of both the New Jersey and Virginia plans at the Constitutional Convention?
    5·2 answers
  • Is Venezuela is larger than Colombia in land area.
    8·1 answer
  • Describe the Five Pillars of Islam
    11·2 answers
  • In the end, the Fort Smith Council resulted in the signing of A. the Reconstruction Treaties of 1866 B. a simple peace treaty be
    11·1 answer
  • During the late 17th and 18th centuries which of the following quiziz
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following most accurately describes the Southern colonies?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!