Answer:
In today's society it's easy for us to use animals as an easy access to testing out our makeup, medicine or products, but we forget we too are animals. We are made up from the same animal cells that the animals we are testing on, where have we gone wrong? Are we forgetting that animals have feelings and are able to feel pain? We put so many animals through unimaginable suffering and lock them up in testing labs to be tortured just to see if the new lipstick will affect us. We have already lost the lives of many animals due to this cruel way of testing, we don't need new shampoos or perfumes, stop testing on innocent animals
Answer:
Speech about artificial boundaries can not divide the natural affinity among people.
Speech:
It is undeniably true that human bonds has no boundaries. A relationship between two individuals cannot be altered or severed by any human made territory. Though artificial boundaries may divide people into two or more territorial groups, the affinities among humans will always transcend such distinctions.
There is a unique characteristic in humanity that unities us in our diversity. There is a natural tendency within humans that makes us embrace each other regardless of territorial, racial or political differences.
It is an innate quality that each one of us has to unlock. Once we unlock this quality, we start to embrace one another and live in harmony with each other. Many a times human connections and bonds have proved to overcome territorial differences. In many instances, one can find that people living in border areas live with one another in harmony despite of political and territorial distinctions between them.
Therefore, the need to embrace one another is very important in order to prove that affinity among humans unite us ever in our diversity.
Explanation:
https://brainly.in/question/14238785
Hope this helps.
Well, it could be either a noun or an adjective. You'll have to give me the definition or the context for me to be specific. I usually only hear it as a noun though.
In my opinion, the correct answer is C. the path of morality versus the path of civil law and order.
Creon's act of banning Polyneices' burial is understandable from the perspective of a king, who wants to protect his authority and punish all who would challenge it. He is a statesman and protector of the law, which means he must always punish an offender, or it would encourage many more people to break laws. However, Antigone's view is different. She thinks there are higher, divine, ethical laws, that are above any particular interests of state and the king, even if he is her own uncle. Her act depicts her bold determination that won't give way to any earthly authority.
