Adding more descriptions of Mr. James Bates about his personality and appearance will make the passage more reliable. Thus, option D is correct.
<h3>Who is Jonathan Swift?</h3>
Jonathan Swift was a well-known author and essay writer whose work Gulliver's travels mocks the customs. In the above passage, Jonathan must add the descriptive details of James Bates to make it more reliable.
Mr. James Bates was a surgeon that worked in London and trained Gulliver to help him learn navigation and maths. His characteristic details are not portrayed much in detail. He helped Gulliver in many ways.
Therefore, option D. adding the descriptive details of Mr. James Bates will be more reliable.
Learn more about Jonathan Swift here:
brainly.com/question/9066127
#SPJ1
Answer:
Fact: State Security clearance was required for government appointments
Statistics : 40% of Egyptians lived below the poverty line.
Explanation:
Revolution 2.0 is a chronological record of the uprising that occurred in Egypt in Jan 2011. The uprising led to the toppling of the then government led by Hosni Mubarak.
The fact used as evidence was that state security approval was sought and granted before anyone could hold any senior position in government or politics. The government achieved this by keeping a dossier - a record of activities- on everyone considered a threat or an activist, which was used to blackmail them in case they decided to raise a dissenting voice.
This control measure was used to ensure that no one in senior position of authority would had enough clout to lead a revolt or revolution.
The statistics was that 40% of Egyptians lived below the poverty line. Hence poverty was used as a weapon in oppressing and subjugating the people.
Answer:
C. wear clothing suited to the occasion
Answer:
The correct answer is C; Change is constant in life.
Explanation:
The theme of change can be identified in several areas and ideas expressed in the story. The polarization between Julian and his mother clearly show both the resistance and the urge to change. Julian insists on the importance of change disregarding his mothers view. Opposing this, the mother´s attitudes, set on tradition, resist this idea. The story shows that wether in favor or against it, change is inevitably present in life.
