Answer:
Yes, answer below!
Explanation:
Yes, he had done several actions against the constitution and overall led to the capital being attacked. He was a major leader and role model, some people would believe whatever he said; and sometimes he said some terrible things. Another topic is how he built part of a wall wasting our governments money just to keep people out when we should be making the regulations larger so we are able to let immigrants come in regulated amounts safely.
If you want to add more or not use it is just fine! It is my personal opinion, but it seems fair.
No, because a PBS documemtary could not have witnessed something and retold it. It most likely is a secondary source, if they interviewed people who have witnessed the thing they are talking about.
In general, no, the revolution in agriculture was no necessary to the Industrial Revolution since the Industrial Revolution relied on things like machines and steel.
<em>Shay's Rebellion</em>
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution for the United States. It is known for being very weak and giving little to no power to the national government. With the Articles of Confederation, the government could not regulate trade, draft soldiers, create and enforce laws properly, tax citizens, and other important matters.
Since the national government was so powerless, most of the power was in the hands of the people and the states. This meant that it was hard to keep people in check, which eventually caused Shay's Rebellion.
Shay's Rebellion was an uprise of farmers who did not want to lose their property and opposed high taxing. Courts were trying to take away their property, as many poor farmers could not pay their taxes. This caused many farmers to revolt, causing a few casualties. This proved the national government was too weak under the Articles of Confederation, as they could do nothing to stop this.
She worked as a cook for plantation owner james burroughs
