Answer:
the answer is -30, -28, -26
Answer:
- <u><em>D. No, because $100,000 is much greater than the values used in the experiment.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
<em>Correlations</em>, when have strong correlation coefficients, which r = 0.9 is, may be good predictors within the limits of the range of the data.
Trying to extrapolate the <em>linear relationship</em> between the variables, <em>x = advertising spending and y= product sales</em>, way beyond the limits of the data used for the study, is too risky, because the data may be linear just for some stages (ranges) but behave very different in other ranges.
As, the option D. states, <em>$100,000 is much greater that the values used in the experiment</em>; hence, the correlation would likely would not be a good predictor for that input.
Answer:
should use a fixed-interval schedule to enhance reading and strengthen his argument (the kids will know exactly when they get rewards)
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is (3) As the x-values go to negative infinily, the function's values are equal to zero.
Explanation: