1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lisa [10]
2 years ago
12

Why did Britain want to prevent India's economy from prospering?

History
1 answer:
Blababa [14]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

So that they could literally exploit India's abundant mineral, agricultural, and labor resources, although mine may not be up to point, it is the condensation of what generally the British did to India. And even though India does have railways, and other modern forms for a society in the victorian to the end of colonization, all of those were made for a specific purpose in mind, to strengthen British control and to make it easier to further exploit india

Explanation:

Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India

An Era of Darkness: The British Empire In India

British Rule in India

You might be interested in
The British government decided to tax the American colonies
alisha [4.7K]
The answer is b, to pay off war debts
7 0
3 years ago
Frank Palko thought the Fifth Amendment ban on double jeopardy applied to his case because he was tried for first degree murder.
amm1812

Answer:

he was tried twice for the same crime.

Explanation:

Double jeopardy clause occurs when a person is put on trial for an offense of which he has already been put on trial before. United States Constitution, states that no <em><u>"person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb..."</u></em>

This can only apply if the accused has already gotten a valid acquittal from a law court or conviction within the same jurisdiction. If this occurs, then the government or prosecutor cannot retry the accused/defendant.

Therefore, Frank Palko believed that double jeopardy would apply in his case because he was tried twice for the same crime.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Name three states today that would be south of the 36°30’ line and three states that would be north of it.
mrs_skeptik [129]

Answer:

The 36°30' North line is the line of latitude that was agreed in the Missouri Compromise to determine the slave status of new states to be admitted into the Union, west of the Mississippi River. States south of the line would be considered slave states and north would be free states.

States today that would be south of the line;

  • Oklahoma
  • Arizona
  • New Mexico

States today that would be north of the line;

  • Washington
  • Oregon
  • Idaho
4 0
3 years ago
HELP! I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLLIEST !!
dedylja [7]

Answer:

The use of the atomic bomb <em>was</em> in retaliation to Pearl Harbor.

Explanation:

After the attack on Pearl Harbor, the US wanted to show Japan that they could reach them, so they bombed Japan with the atomic bomb.

Hope this helped!!  :)

6 0
3 years ago
What happened in Afghanistan after the collapse of the Soviet Union
Fofino [41]

Answer:

After the withdrawal of Soviet troops 25 years ago, Afghanistan plunged into a civil war causing further destruction. ... The invasion had left behind a devastated country, with more than one million Afghans being killed and around 5.5 million displaced.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Industrial European nations wanted to be prosperous, so they set sights on Australia and Asia. True or False?
    15·1 answer
  • The Farmers’ Alliance did which of the following?
    10·2 answers
  • In his work Summa Theologica, who concluded that there is no conflict between faith and reason?
    11·2 answers
  • What was the source of Florence’s wealth and power?
    9·2 answers
  • Who gave the slogan "Do or Die:
    10·1 answer
  • What does rNA stand for
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the British have to stay within 15 miles of the coast during the revolutionary war?
    6·2 answers
  • How did the roman republic differ from government under the Etruscans ?
    12·2 answers
  • The reason the articles of confederation were weak was because:
    13·1 answer
  • Lewis and Clark’s expedition strengthened US claims to the
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!