All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following are considered command economies? Select all that apply

History

2 answers:

Ainat [17]3 years ago

5 0

<u>The option (B) and (E) are correct. Communism and Socialism are considered command economies. </u>

Further Explanation:

Command Economy:

Command economy is the economy in which a, and all the prices of the products in an economy are determined by the government.

Communism is considered as a command economy because the ideology of communism states that all the property of the country should be controlled by the government and the private ownership should be minimum.

Socialism is also considered as a command economy because its ideology states that the government should control all the production activities in the country. It allows the private ownership of the property. It makes it a command economy because all the activities are carried out by the government.

<u>Thus, communism and socialism are considered as a command economy. </u>

Learn more:

1. Learn more about the demand curve

brainly.com/question/8794304

2. Learn more about the supply curve

brainly.com/question/2195487

3. Learn more about government intervention

brainly.com/question/6156396

Answer details:

Grade: Middle School

Subject: Economics

Chapter: Types of Economy

Keywords: following, considered, command economies, Select, apply, Capitalism, Communism, Free markets, Laissez-Faire, Socialism.

BigorU [14]3 years ago

5 0

Answer: Options B and E

Explanation:

A command economy is those in which the government decides what things must be produced and the prices.

Capitalism and free markets are the opposite of it, so we can discard those ones.

Laissez-Faire has basses in the freedom of choice, so here again, we have a free market.

Now, with communism and socialism the government has the power to, for example, control the prices of some things in order to make it more accessible for some group, or control the amount of some item that a person can buy.

So the correct answer is B communism and E socialism

You might be interested in

Why is the United States a nation steeped in Enlightenment ideals and beliefs whereas in Europe the Enlightenment was largely di

USPshnik [31]

United States steeped in Enlightenment ideals because they see it as the philosophical basis of the American Revolution, whereas in Europe the Enlightenment was largely discredited because to them it affect the social and political order.

<h3>What is Enlightenment in United States?</h3>

The American Enlightenment can be described as the intellectual and religious freedom that took place in the America around the 19th century which can been seen as the one that brought about how the revolution of the America came to light.

And as a result of this , the new America came to light and this brought about positive effect on the people of America whereas to the Europeans the enlightenment seems to have an effect on the social and political order of the region which made them not to take it the way the Americans took it and on the other note ,the enlightenment in the United States of America brought about political change.

Learn more about Enlightenment at:

brainly.com/question/12481854

#SPJ1

3 0

1 year ago

Beth was driving to work when she looked at her phone for a moment because

Ulleksa [173]

It represents criminal

7 0

3 years ago

Why did Maria and Julian Martinez demonstrate pottery making at expositions? How did it benefit the Pueblo community?

Alja [10]

Answer:

Explanation:Born Maria Antonia Montoya, Maria Martinez became one of the best-known Native potters of the twentieth century due to her excellence as a ceramist and her connections with a larger, predominantly non-Native audience. Though she lived at the Pueblo of San I.l.d.e.f.o.n.s.o, about 20 miles north of Santa Fe, New Mexico, from her birth in 1887 until her death in 1980, her work and her life had a wide reaching importance to the Native art world by re-framing Native ceramics as a fine art. Before the arrival of the railroad to the area in the 1880's, pots were used in the Pueblos for food storage, cooking, and ceremonies. But with inexpensive pots appearing along the rail line, these practices were in decline. By the 1910's, Ms. Martinez found a way to continue the art by selling her pots to a non-Native audience where they were purchased as something beautiful to look at rather than as utilitarian objects. Her mastery as a ceramist was noted in her village while she was still young. She learned the ceramic techniques that were used in the Southwest for several millennia by watching potters from San I.l.d.e.f.o.n.s.o, especially her aunt N.i.c.h.o.l.a.s.a as well as potters (including Margaret T.a.f.o.y.a from Santa Clara), from other nearby Pueblos. All the raw materials had to be gathered and processed carefully or the final vessel would not fire properly. The clay was found locally. To make the pottery stronger it had to be mixed with a temper made from s.h.e.r.d.s of broken pots that had been pounded into a powder or volcanic ash. When mixed with water, the elasticity of the clay and the strength of the temper could be formed into different shapes, including a rounded pot (known as an o.l.l.a) or a flat plate, using only the artist’s hands as the potting wheel was not used. The dried vessel needed to be scraped, sanded, smoothed, then covered with a slip (a thin solution of clay and water). The slip was polished by rubbing a smooth stone over the surface to flatten the clay and create a shiny finish—a difficult and time-consuming process. Over the polished slip the pot was covered with designs painted with an iron-rich solution using either pulverized iron ore or a reduction of wild plants called g.u.a.c.o. These would be dried but required a high temperature firing to change the brittle clay to hard ceramics. Even without kilns, the ceramists were able to create a fire hot enough to transform the pot by using manure. Making ceramics in the Pueblo was considered a communal activity, where different steps in the process were often shared. The potters helped each other with the arduous tasks such as mixing the paints and polishing the slip. Ms. Martinez would form the perfectly symmetrical vessels by hand and leave the decorating to others. Throughout her career, she worked with different family members, including her husband Julian, her son Adam and his wife Santana, and her son P.o.p.o.v.i D.a. As the pots moved into a fine art market, Ms. Martinez was encouraged to sign her name on the bottom of her pots. Though this denied the communal nature of the art, she began to do so as it resulted in more money per pot. To help other potters in the Pueblo, Ms. Martinez was known to have signed the pots of others, lending her name to help the community. Helping her Pueblo was of paramount importance to Ms. Martinez. She lived as a proper Pueblo woman, avoiding self-aggrandizement and insisting to scholars that she was just a wife and mother even as her reputation in the outside world increased. Maria and Julian Martinez pioneered a style of applying a matte-black design over polished-black. Similar to the pot pictured here, the design was based on pottery s.h.e.r.d.s found on an Ancestral Pueblo dig site dating to the twelfth to seventeenth centuries at what is now known as B.a.n.d.e.l.i.e.r National Monument. The M.a.r.t.i.n.e.z.e.s worked at the site, with Julian helping the archaeologists at the dig and Maria helping at the campsite. Julian Martinez spent time drawing and painting the designs found on the walls and on the s.h.e.r.d.s of pottery into his notebooks, designs he later recreated on pots. In the 1910's, Maria and Julian worked together to recreate the black-on-black ware they found at the dig, experimenting with clay from different areas and using different firing techniques. Taking a cue from Santa Clara pots, they discovered that smothering the fire with powdered manure removed the oxygen while retaining the heat and resulted in a pot that was blackened. This resulted in a pot that

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What happens when one group or individual controls all three powers

marshall27 [118]

When one group or individual controls all three powers abuse of power arises, bringing a decline in the rights and liberties of the citizens. Only true Democracy, through the appropriate implementation of the separation of powers represents a guarantee of said liberties for the citizens. In this way, no power or institution becomes more important than the others.

7 0

3 years ago

Who is aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

sergey [27]

Russian novelist and historian, help spread global awareness of Gulag<span />

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers