Answer:
✓Poorer countries have historically been responsible for the bulk of world carbon emissions because of poor technology and environmental regulations.........> [FALSE]
✓Air and water quality in developed countries is generally much better today than it was several decades ago.
..........>[TRUE]
✓Tackling climate change issues is likely to only modestly dent long-term economic growth.
-------->[ TRUE ]
✓Carbon emissions are negatively correlated with economic growth.
------>[FALSE]
Explanation:
Climate change can be regarded as
global phenomenon involving
transformation of climate as a result of
changes in the usual climate system of the planet, in regards to precipitation as well as temperature and wind which is been caused due to human activities. Climate change usually brings about
increase in income inequalities which could exist between countries and within countries. In a situation whereby there is is a little increase in the mean temperature in the globe, let say 2 °C, that is measured against 1990 levels, could easily make developing countries to experience net negative market sector, and make developed countries to experience net positive market sector.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Would you consider this an ethical marketing strategy?
No. Of course not. It is not ethical. However, it is not illegal.
It cannot be considered ethical because this piece of advertisement is playing with the lack and necessity of the poor people of San Dayana.
The lottery advertisement is trying to be lucrative and benefit from the ignorance and poverty of the people of this poor country.
Once said that people are the ones who had the last word on the decision to buy or not to buy the lottery tickets. They know that the probabilities are minimum to win the big prize.
So instead of work, save and invest, or do other legal things to prosper, they prefer to spend their hard-earn money to get the "miracle" and become rich.
It seems that you have missed the necessary options to answer this question, but anyway, here are the answers. These are the ones that represent typical account fees and this would be ATM fee, Service Fee and Minimum Balance Fee. Hope this answers your question.
Answer:
Asset Allocated cost
Land $58,000
Building $188,500
Equipment $43,500
Debit Assets $290,000
Credit Note payable $290,000
Being entries to recognize the purchase of assets by note payable.
Explanation:
The cost of each asset (land, building, and equipment) will be allocated to them based on the market value. The higher the market value, the higher the cost apportioned to each asset from the single amount paid for all the assets.
Given that the market values are in the ratio of
64,000:208,000:48,000 for land, building and equipment respectively. This is equivalent to ratios 4:13:3.
Hence, where the total amount paid is $290,000, cost apportionment
Land
= 4/20 × $290,000
= $58,000
Building
= 13/20 × $290,000
= $188,500
Equipment
= 3/20 × $290,000
= $43,500
When an asset is purchased with a note payable signed, the asset is debited and the note payable is credited.