For the answer to the question above, I think that <span>the initial titer that has been done to her may have been done too early in the infection that detectable levels of antibody were not present yet so that's why they have to repeat it.</span>
Answer:
As I think the answer is D.
Answer:
6
Explanation:
Cause after 6 the graphed line stays the same, which means it stopped growing.
Answer:
Case 1 ⇒ Bb x bb ⇒ F1 = 50% Bb, black + 50% bb, white
Case 2 ⇒ Bb x Bb ⇒ F1 = 75% Black + 25% white
Case 3 ⇒ Bb x Bb ⇒ F1 = 25% BB + 50% Bb + 25% bb
⇒ Bb x bb ⇒ F1 = 50% Bb + 50% bb
Case 4 ⇒ BB x BB ⇒ F1 = 100% BB Black
⇒ Bb x BB ⇒ F1 = 50% BB + 50% Bb = 100% Black
⇒ bb x BB ⇒ F1 = 100% Bb black
Case 5 ⇒ bb x bb ⇒ F1 = 100% bb white
Case 6 ⇒ Bb x bb ⇒ F1 = 50% Bb black + 50% bb white
Case 7 ⇒ Bb x Bb ⇒ F1 = 75% black + 25% white
Explanation:
Due to technical problems, you will find the complete explanation in the attached files
Answer:
The correct answer is "Koch's postulates".
Explanation:
The missing options of this question are:
a) spontaneous generation
b) Koch's postulates
c) epidemiology
d) vaccination
The correct answer is option b) "Koch's postulates".
Koch's postulates propose four criteria used to establish that a pathogen is responsible for a disease. In his famous experiments, Robert Koch was able to prove that <em>Bacillus anthracis</em> is the cause of anthrax by injecting to a mouse an isolated culture from the blood of an injected sheep. The scenario established in the question is very similar to anthrax, and the scientific approach to look for the pathogen of the disease is following the principles of Koch's postulates.
