The case of Near v. Minnesota established the principle that the only under the most extraordinary circumstances could the government prevent the publication of newspapers and magazines.
<h3>What entails the
Near v. Minnesota?</h3>
In the case of Near v. Minnesota the Supreme Court ruled that a prior restraint on publication violated the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Hence, the case of Near v. Minnesota established the principle that the only under the most extraordinary circumstances could the government prevent the publication of newspapers and magazines.
Therefore, the Option II is correct.
Read more about Near v. Minnesota
<em>brainly.com/question/7555838</em>