Answer:
1. The Romans and Jews had different religion
2. The Romans had come and conquered the land of the Jews
3. The Romans were killing the Jews so they would follow the religion
Explanation:
This is why they had conflict
Hope this helped c: <3
Answer:
He was hated by the rulers because the rulers wife probably liked that person and didn't want to be with the ruler. They hated Jesus more than a murderer because everyone would do everything for Jesus and they had to respect him because he was the son of god. The roman rulers aren't supposed to hate Jesus just because he has to be treated with respect and mostly because he gave people life. If Jesus didn't die for us we wouldn't be here right now and everyone should be grateful for everything that he did for us. People should not hate Jesus for giving an opportunity to see how the world is and how life is they should love Jesus for what he did for everyone that lives and the future babies that are coming into the world. That's why the roman rulers hated Jesus more than a murderer.
Answer:
In both the New England and Chesapeake regions, English colonists established settler colonies based on agriculture, in contrast to French trading posts in Canada. These settlements were based on some form of agriculture and had some measure of self-sufficiency, especially in New England. For example, permanent settlements were established at both Jamestown in the Chesapeake and Boston in Massachusetts Bay. The economies of the New England and Chesapeake colonies were very different. The New England colonies had a more diverse economy which included shipping, lumber, and export of food crops. On the other hand, the Chesapeake colonies' economy focused almost exclusively on the production and export of tobacco and a few other cash crops. This focus on cash crops fostered a need for slave labor in the Chesapeake. As a result, more enslaved Africans went to the Chesapeake than New England. The New England climate and terrain was not suitable for growing cash crops like tobacco. A plantation economy did not develop in New England because plantation crops would not grow. In the Chesapeake, however, the soil, weather, and flat terrain were excellent for tobacco growing. Had the climate of Virginia been more similar to Connecticut, it’s reasonable to say the two colonies would have been very similar. The sharp contrast in the climates and terrain accounts for much of the difference in the development of the two regions.
