The main arguments for having a stronger national government arose because of the <em>b. </em><em>inability </em><em>of the </em><em>national government</em><em> to </em><em>maintain order </em><em>under the Articles.</em>
The <u>Articles of Confederation created a very weak federal government </u>because people did not want a federal government that would become tyrannical.
The federal government under the Articles of Confederation could not:
- <em>draft new people into the army </em>
- <em>not tax</em>
- <em>form a national Judiciary </em>
These meant that the <u>federal government could not keep order </u>within the nation as they neither had an army to do so nor a federal judiciary to take offenders to court.
In conclusion, the Articles of Confederation needed to be replaced because it created a federal government too weak to keep the nation safe internally.
<em>For more information, look at brainly.com/question/874744.</em>
Options for this question include:
a. The Constitution's checks and balances helped establish a stable government.
b. inability of the national government to maintain order under the Articles
c. permanent alliances between foreign nations
d. interstate trade