1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anyanavicka [17]
2 years ago
14

Why does tubman results undergroud trips worth this risk involved why or why not?

History
1 answer:
Lynna [10]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Harriet Tubman is perhaps the most well-known of all the Underground Railroad's “conductors.” During a ten-year span, she made 19 trips into the South and escorted over 300 slaves to freedom. And, as she once proudly pointed out to Frederick Douglass, in all of her journeys she “never lost a single passenger.”  Harriet Tubman, too, believed that all men and women are born free.  Hence, it was worth the risk each time she made a trip to the South to gather slaves.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Por que os continentes americanos são chamados de America latina?
Dafna1 [17]
Numa definição mais literal, próxima da origem semântica, a América Latina designa países das Américas onde uma língua românica
6 0
3 years ago
Identify the effects of cultural diffusion as positive or negative. PLZ HELP THX
densk [106]
Fear or hostility toward other cultures: negative


gaining an understanding of foreign customs and beliefs: positive



fear about loss of a national cultural identity: negative



choice of different types of food: positive
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these is MOST LIKELY to occur after the government increases taxes?
dusya [7]

Answer:

C) Consumer spending decreases.:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the early 1500s, what made the Incan Empire vulnerable outside invasion?
ASHA 777 [7]
Honestly I have no clue I’m still learning sorry
6 0
3 years ago
Do you think it was right for the United States to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Why or why not?
klemol [59]

Answer:

There are pros and cons to this question

Explanation:You can look at it in many different ways. Japan was not planning on surrendering any time soon. They believe that dying in combat is one of the most repectible deaths ever. If we did not bomb them, They would not have surrendered which would have lead to many more american deaths. Earlier in the war they bombed our naval base pearl harbor, so they started it. Thats the argument for bombing them.

The argument agains bombing them is that hiroshima and Nagasaki were huge cities. There were thousands of people in thise cities, Civilians. Japan did bomb us but they bombed a Naval base. So we punished the civilians of Japan and we Also punished the kids of those civilians because those bombs had radiation in them which affected the people that werent killed by the blast but were in the area that the radiation was at. The radiation affected those poeples unborn children, gave them birth defects and some of them died because of it.

So was it right? I think that the decision to bomb them was not an easy one. I think it took a lot of time to come to this decision. But overall it did end this war which most likely save a lot of american lives.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • For what primary purpose did the Spanish enslave many American Indians?
    6·1 answer
  • Maynard Jackson helped to oversee significant growth during his time as Atlanta's mayor. Which of these important public works p
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true about the Mayan Civilization?
    6·2 answers
  • What roles did Tom Watson play in Georgia politics
    9·2 answers
  • How much do you think an individual's behavior predicts their likelihood of being victimized?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the initial result of the presidential election in 2000?
    13·1 answer
  • How was Mao and the Communists able to defeat Jiang and the Nationalists in the Chinese Civil War?
    7·1 answer
  • Why is it important to continue to study the Holocaust?
    14·1 answer
  • Were European goods (foodstuffs, weapons, tools) a help or a detriment to the Indian tribes that acquired them?
    14·1 answer
  • Which two cities expanded during the 1800's due to railroads?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!