"<span>The rejection of the Olive Branch Petition" would be the best option, since this was submitted to Britain before the Declaration in the hopes that the colonies would be able to prevent war but still have Britain address their grievances. </span>
I. Introduction
In the 1760s, Benjamin Rush, a native of Philadelphia, recounted a visit to Parliament. Upon seeing the king’s throne in the House of Lords, Rush said he “felt as if he walked on sacred ground” with “emotions that I cannot describe.”1 Throughout the eighteenth century, colonists had developed significant emotional ties with both the British monarchy and the British constitution. The British North American colonists had just helped to win a world war and most, like Rush, had never been more proud to be British. And yet, in a little over a decade, those same colonists would declare their independence and break away from the British Empire. Seen from 1763, nothing would have seemed as improbable as the American Revolution.
The Revolution built institutions and codified the language and ideas that still define Americans’ image of themselves. Moreover, revolutionaries justified their new nation with radical new ideals that changed the course of history and sparked a global “age of revolution.” But the Revolution was as paradoxical as it was unpredictable. A revolution fought in the name of liberty allowed slavery to persist. Resistance to centralized authority tied disparate colonies ever closer together under new governments. The revolution created politicians eager to foster republican selflessness and protect the public good but also encouraged individual self-interest and personal gain. The “founding fathers” instigated and fought a revolution to secure independence from Britain, but they did not fight that revolution to create a “democracy.” To successfully rebel against Britain, however, required more than a few dozen “founding fathers.” Common colonists joined the fight, unleashing popular forces that shaped the Revolution itself, often in ways not welcomed by elite leaders. But once unleashed, these popular forces continued to shape the new nation and indeed the rest of American history.
http://www.americanyawp.com/text/05-the-american-revolution/
Answer:
wow
Explanation:
this makes no sense...so unnecessary
Based on the excerpt and the historical records, the native people, that is, <u>Cherokee Nation were forcefully removed from their ancestral land</u>.
<h3>Treaty of New Echota</h3>
The Treaty of New Echota was initially signed by the United States and some minority known as Treaty Party in the Cherokee Nation in 1835.
While most of the Cherokee Nation did not support and agree with the Treaty, the United States government forcefully removed the Cherokee Nation from their land, Southeast of Georgia to the West where the Native Indian lives.
The Cherokee Nation was later forcefully removed in what was known as the Trail of Tears between 1836 to 1839.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the Cherokee Nation were forced to move from present-day Georgia to present-day Oklahoma.
Learn more about Cherokee Nation here: brainly.com/question/2297390
