Answer:
reduces the risk of rejection by a social group
Explanation:
Conformity: In social psychology, the term conformity is defined as a pervasive type of social influence. Conformity refers to the propensity of an individual to behave, think, or act according to the rest of the member of a particular group or group norms. People generally make changes in their attitude, behavior, thinking pattern, or beliefs to fit into a particular group.
Types of conformity:
1. Internalization.
2. Compliance.
3. Identification
Examples include bullying, criticism, persuasion, etc.
In the question above, the scenario illustrates that conformity reduces the risk of rejection by a social group.
Most Greeks lived near the Eastern Mediterranean sea and in southern Europe.
Question Options:
a) Lesser developed countries tend to have larger populations so as the economy starts to grow them are more people they can put to work than more developed countries.
b) Lesser developed countries can adopt already invented technologies rapidly enabling their workforce to become more productive.
c) Workers in lesser developed countries work longer hours and thus produce more than workers in more developed countries.
d) Wages are really low in lesser developed countries so firms can hire more people and produce mor ethan firms in more developed places.
Answer: Lesser developed countries can adopt already invented technologies rapidly enabling their workforce to become more productive.
By and large, this selected option is really self explanatory.
Lesser developed countries already have the tools and resources needed to develop provided by developed countries. This in turn makes their growth faster ss in developed countries, the tools needed for development takes a long while to be achieved but what lesser developed countries needs to do is copy already proven methods.
The culture, and when and where Charleston and New York began. Hope I Helped!
The cognitive-social theories focus largely on the feelings, rather than reasoning and certain social learnings are not observed directly. Further, they also ignore development and maturation which occurs over the time. This theory is unable to explain the change of personality and motivation, with time.
