It is not recommended to skip performing the risk identification on a project. If this process is skipped, the organization might run into unforeseen dangers that will stall their projects and prevent them from reaching their objectives.
<h3>What is the risk identification step?</h3>
The risk identification process is designed to study and find out the elements that will prevent an organization from reaching its set objectives.
he risk identification process helps the organization to know the risk that is set before them and prepare to bypass or overcome the challenges. The risk identification step is the first step that must be taken to avoid problems along the way.
Learn more about the risk identification step here:
brainly.com/question/28214983
#SPJ1
Answer:
C. conservatism
Explanation:
The lower of cost or market basis of valuing inventories is an example of conservatism. This term refers to trying to anticipate possible future losses, instead of gains and making certain decisions in order to limit those losses. Which some decisions may include lowering costs and/or prices in order to sell more and cover those potential losses.
Answer: a - the management and board of directors of the targeted firm disapprove of the proposed merger
Explanation:
A hostile takeover is a situation where the board of directors and senior managers are against the proposed merger.
There are several pre-offer takeover defense mechanisms. One of them is the golden parachute.
The golden parachute is a compensation agreement between a firm and its senior managers. The firm promises a very lucrative amount of money if the senior managers leave the firm if there's a change of control.
There are also post offer takeover defense. They include:
A. The crown jewel - in a crown jewel the firm sells off a subsidiary or an asset to a third party in an effort to mitigate the hostile take over.
B. Greenmail - the target buys its shares back from the acquiring company at a price higher than the market price. This is done with an agreement that the acquirer leaves the target company. It is a form of payoff by the target company.
Answer:
$124,440
Explanation:
Given a monthly principal and interest payment of $679, over the 30 year period, Naomi would have paid back
$679 * 30 year * 12 months in a year
= $244,440
With a loan amount of @120,000, the interest portion of the total repayment is therefore = total repayment less the loan amount
= $244,440 - $120000
= $124,440.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
As maximization of the earnings per share might not be the same thing as the wealth maximization which is the primary goal of the company because the company not only has to generate higher profits but also manage all the risks of the entity which might increase by unethical trading in race to increase earnings per share. Furthermore, to enjoy less costly debt finance which would increase the earnings per share, would result in increase in financial risk, which might again head the company towards disaster if not well managed.
The other solid point against the statement would be that the primary purpose can not be the maximization of earnings per share as it stresses upon spending less on corporate social responsibility and as the result the company stock will be less valued at stock exchange. The less valued stock is because the companies like Dow and S & P Global adds no green value to the stock if the company is not spending on social responsibility programs.
Hence the statement is incorrect.
