The arguments against "choice to drink" and "prohibition lead to losing jobs", whereas for prohibition "banning alcohol solves problems" and "causes immorality".
<h3>What causes alcohol addiction?</h3>
Alcohol addiction is produced due to this substance can alter certain cells in the brain to cause addiction and dependence.
Alcohol consumption produces the release of dopamine and endorphins (two hormones) in the brain.
The arguments against "choice to drink alcohol" and "prohibition may lead to losing jobs", whereas for prohibition "banning alcohol solves problems" and "causes immorality".
Learn more about alcohol addiction here:
brainly.com/question/5851849
#SPJ1
Answer:
I would say it forms a fruit
Renewable.
hope this helps.
please mark as braininess.<span />
If the requirements of the uniform commercial code (UCC) are not followed, then the BUYER would most likely suffer the greatest injury. A buyer is an individual who buys something.
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a set of regulations that govern commercial transactions in the USA.
This code (UCC) was first published in 1952 after approval from the American Law Institute.
The major goal of the UCC is the improvement of the principles that govern commercial transactions in the USA.
Learn more about the UCC here:
brainly.com/question/15980446
Answer:
“Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
Explanation:
