I believe the answer is one
To write an autobiography, you want to focus on the good, memorable moments, and how others influenced you to get you to the position you are in today. Therefore, all of the answers but the first and sixth are good answers to use in this scenario.
Starting from the very beginning makes a timeline out of it and doesn't allow the autobiography to focus on the development of your character.
Starting with present time and looking back shows the audience how you have used certain tactics to get where you are today and how you applied them to your character and strengthened it overall.
Including how important people influenced you is a great decision because ti is going to show the development and changes that you made and how these people helped shape you into the wonderful human being you are today.
Focusing on your point of view would be best because an autobiography is about you. Emphasizing other points of view would just allow the readers to infer certain opinions.
Writing about how you became stronger shows development in your personality and character and is a fantastic addition to your story.
Writing about funny moments wouldn't be the best choice because it emphasizes unimportant scenarios.
Overall, it is your story, so you can choose what you want to be in it!
Answer:
The meaning of Bear´t is to keep your thoughts and opinions to yourself. The character here. Polonious, is trying to say that the person listening to him has to bear something in mind. He is giving his son a piece of advice.Additionally, he means to warn his son by making him pay attention to his words.The word left out between but and few is men.He is trying to tell his son that he should be friendly but careful with the people he trusts
Explanation:
Answer:
Andrew Jackson opposed the establishment of a national, federal bank and he would have opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision. Furthermore, he denied that the ruling prevented him from vetoing legislation extending the charter of the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson would also have opposed the ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden, which he would have said expanded the Congress's power to cover interstate commerce to also include commercial navigation
