Answer:
To descrive the rights to life, freedom, and property
Explanation:
The third and fourth answers are distraction answers, meaning that they are there so that there are more than two answers. The second answer does not make sense because private property is not the main focused of the amendment and the third answer does not make sense because it says "to describe obligations to obey the, serve in the armed forces, and pay for property." This does not make sense because Americans are not obligated to serve in the armed forces. The first choice makes more sense since it is referring to the process of a trial by jury something the fifth amendment is known for allowing when they read you your Miranda rights. However it does not fully describe a trial by jury.
Answer:
water phosphorus
Explanation:
Osteoporosis is most likely to be affected by water phosphorus.
No, students shouldn't be allowed to have pets at school. Though many students love the thought of pets by their sides, it can be a distraction and many students that have allergies to pets. Imagine sitting in a classroom taking a test, and pets start going crazy, barking or causing a scene. Or students rubbing their eyes or sneezing at the shedding of fur. Students could also start playing with their pets and become distratced from their teachers. In conclusion, students may love pets at their side and may think it would be better, but in the end it would be a pretty bad idea.
1) <span>It is inductive because it is based on personal experience
2) </span><span>hasty generalization
3) </span><span>Most colleges should consider extracurricular activities when determining whom to accept.
hope this helps</span>