1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dem82 [27]
2 years ago
12

Why does Conant believe that the United States should join the war?

History
1 answer:
lara [203]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Germany's resumption of submarine attacks on passenger and merchant ships in 1917 became the primary motivation behind Wilson's decision to lead the United States into World War I. Germany also believed that the United States had jeopardized its neutrality by acquiescing to the Allied blockade of Germany.

You might be interested in
Would u rather be a loyalist or a patriot and why
aliina [53]
Patriot,
Cus loyalist are the equivalent to Trump supporters.
7 0
3 years ago
What jobs did JFK have before President?
Contact [7]
After the war, Kennedy represented the Massachusetts's 11th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1947 to 1953. He was subsequently elected to the U.S. Senate and served as the junior Senator from Massachusetts from 1953 to 1960.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Industrial Revolution impact the life of the average worker in Europe?
Lera25 [3.4K]

The growth of the Industrial Revolution depended on the ability to transport raw materials and finished goods over long distances. There were three main types of transportation that increased during the Industrial Revolution: waterways, roads, and railroads. ... The roads also improved immensely during this time period.

HOPE THIS HELPED!!!

6 0
3 years ago
What was the result of the phalanx attack followed by cavalry charge at Gaugamela?
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

The end of the Peloponnesian War did not bring the promised “…beginning of freedom for all of Greece.”[1] Instead, Sparta provoked a series of wars which rearranged the system of alliances which had helped them win the long war against Athens. A peace conference between Sparta and Thebes in 371 ended badly and the Spartans promptly marched upon Thebes with an army of nine thousand hoplites and one thousand cavalry. Opposing them were six thousand Theban and allied hoplites and one thousand cavalry.[2]

Over generations, the Thebans had been increasing the depth of their phalanx, generally given pride of place on the right wing of coalition armies, from the traditional eight men, to sixteen, then twenty-five and even thirty-five ranks. As the Spartan and Theban armies maneuvered toward the plain of Leuctra, the brilliant Theban general Epaminondas devised a new tactic which would use the deep phalanx to destroy the myth of Spartan superiority.

Over the generations, the citizens of Thebes had developed a reputation as tough, unyielding fighters. Epaminondas had witnessed the power of the deep Theban phalanx at previous battles, and increased the depth of the phalanx to fifty ranks, but only eighty files wide. But Epaminondas’ true innovation was to position the deep Theban column not on the right, where it would have clashed with the Spartan’s weaker allies, but on the left, where it would attack the main phalanx of the Spartan “Peers” led by King Cleombrotus, arranged only twelve ranks deep. In other words, Epaminondas was concentrating his fighting power at the critical point in the evenly-spaced, less concentrated Spartan phalanx. Finally, he arranged the Theban’s allies on his right would advance “in echelon”, each poleis’ phalanx staying slightly to the rear of that to its left, so that the allied right would protect the Theban’s flank, but not initially engage with the enemy (see Leuctra map – ‘Initial Situation’). When asked why he positioned the Theban phalanx opposite the Spartan king, Epaminondas stated he would “crush…the head of the serpent”.[3]

3 0
2 years ago
What were the arguments for and against providing women the right to vote?
allsm [11]
Well, for one, women didn't really want the right to vote (at least not all -- anti-suffragettes were not in favor). One of the major reasons that they did not want the right to vote is that it could bring them into conscription or other war-related activities (which anti-suffragettes were not particularly fond of). Domestic life also seemed more amiable for a lot of women, who were not particularly interested in the state of politics. 

As for general anti-arguments, you have the fact that many people did not believe that women would be as knowledgeable on voting/politics as men (also why rich and high-class women were given the right to vote before those who were of a poorer class). 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If dalman and lei issue policies and procedures regarding the requirements for reporting to work on time, they would be employin
    10·1 answer
  • Death Valley is an arid, low-lying area in (1 point) California. Arizona. New Mexico. South Carolina.
    5·2 answers
  • What was the major influences of the french revolution​
    13·1 answer
  • How are human beings different from angels?
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP DUE TODAY!!! How was English Parliament in the 18th Century an example of a bicameral legislative branch?
    7·1 answer
  • I will mark as brainliest if you can answer all the questions plz
    15·1 answer
  • Which groups did not share in the prosperity of the late 1800s?
    8·2 answers
  • Who is Asoka???????????​
    12·1 answer
  • John and Will ran for 6th grade class president. John got two votes for every vote Will got. It was necessary to get more than h
    5·1 answer
  • Question 8 (1 point)
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!