explain the roles of native Americans during the time of the constitution. what did the faimilies and communities look like?

History

1 answer:

Dmitrij [34]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

What were the Native American family roles?

Image result for explain the roles of native Americans during the time of the constitution. what did the families and communities look like?

Native American families valued responsibility. Having an extended family allowed each person to be responsible for something. In some tribes, a second set of parents were chosen for an infant at birth. These unrelated people worked together to raise that child.

You might be interested in

Read the excerpt below and answer the question.

RUDIKE [14]

In this excerpt, the prairie is used as a symbol of Democracy.

Answer: Option B.

Explanation:

Democracy is a form of government which has been said as by the people, for the people, of the people. This form of government has been selected by the people who are eligible to vote and are formed as their elected representatives who will take up their problems and solve their problems by the representatives.

In this form of government, majority of the power is in the hands of the people who will elect the representatives. These representatives will work for the betterment of the people and for the development of the country.

6 0

4 years ago

2. What is the purpose of a party's national convention? *

vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

to select the party's nominee for president.

6 0

3 years ago

Witch city was located nearest the Nile river delta

pashok25 [27]

The city located nearest the Delta of the Nile is Cairo, Egypt

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Question 1 of 10

Jobisdone [24]

Answer:6,1 is the answer

4 0

3 years ago

The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving?

satela [25.4K]

The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.

Writing for the conservative group, The Heritage Foundation, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "when judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."

Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, Roe v. Wade (1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers