"In order to address the question we would have to assess it carefully. Terrorismappears to be problematic to define. So far no internationally accepted legal<span>de<span>fi<span>ni<span>ti<span><span>on of te</span><span>rr<span>or<span>is<span><span>m ex</span><span>is<span>ts<span><span>, de</span><span>sp<span>it<span><span>e th</span><span><span>e va</span><span>ri<span>ou<span><span>s at</span><span>te<span>mp<span>ts<span><span>. Th</span><span><span>e po</span><span>lit<span>ical</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>connotatio<span>ns of the term make such a task</span></span>quasiimpossible from a legal point of view. Constituting one of the pathologies of the political system, terrorism andpolitical violence are to be studied first as social phenomena and then as illegalactivities that put at risk the well-being of innocent citizens. States undoubtedlyhave both the obligation and the necessity to protect their own citizens, giventhat terrorist attacks pose a threat to both the internal and the international<span>legal and political order. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 will remain in the collective</span>memory as the day when international terrorism managed to strike the heart of <span>th<span>e so<span>le su<span>pe<span>rp<span>ow<span>er su<span>bs<span>eq<span>ue<span>nt<span>ly be<span>co<span>mi<span>ng th<span>e ou<span>tm<span>os<span>t th<span>re<span>at to the</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>contemporary world order. The response to this attack was criticized heavilyex post by various scholars as well as executive security personnel of the U.S. Thepresent essay in accordance with the critics of the military intervention argues <span>that such a strategy has not been effective." Credits: Nikolaos Nikolakakis.
</span>
I’m gonna say D because all of the choices make sense
The factory system is a method of manufacturing using machinery and division of labour. Because of the high capital cost of machinery and factory buildings, factories are typically owned by capitalists who employ the operative labour. Use of machinery with the division of labor reduced the required skill level of workers and also increased the output per worker.
The factory system was first adopted in Britain at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in the late 18th century and later spread around the world.[1] It replaced the putting-out system. The main characteristic of the factory system is the use of machinery, originally powered by water or steam and later by electricity. Other characteristics of the system mostly derive from the use of machinery or economies of scale, the centralization of factories, and standardization of interchangeable parts.
The idea I summarized about this picture is, bricks. ;)
Answer: Propaganda
The Cultural Revolution was a social and political movement in China from 1966 to 1976 initiated by Mao Zedong, chairman of the Communist Party of China. Its purpose was to spread the communist ideology in the country by removing elements of capitalism or traditional Chinese society.
During this period, Mao's personality cult grew enormously. Propaganda was widespread and it was the main way in which the government was able to influence its citizens. Millions of people were persecuted and suffered forced labor, torture, imprisonment and sometimes execution. Large segments of the population were displaced and many elements of Chinese culture destroyed.