3 years ago

Why might the first and second Estates be opposed to change

1 answer:

dsp733 years ago

8 0

The First and Second Estates opposed to change because they were wealthy and had to pay little taxes because of the Third Estate. They had privileges, while the third estate did all the work.

You might be interested in

Match the section of the U.S. with its correct characteristic.

Zepler [3.9K]

Agricultural; South
Boston and New York City; North
Individual Homesteads; West

3 0

2 years ago

How might the United States and Mexico be different if the two countries had gone to war in 1916

Margarita [4]

They would have been fighting each other

5 0

2 years ago

What is a source of the current Arab-Israeli conflict? Question 22 options: Iraq's takeover of Kuwait al-Qaeda's terrorist attac

Arisa [49]

Answer:

all i know is itis not the decline of the Ottoman Empire

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of these is something that all the poems in the reading having in common?

icang [17]

Correct answer:

Poetry deals with particular things in a concrete language, this is what they have in common, since our emotions respond easily to these things. <u>A poem is often concrete and particular since the message, if there is one, </u><u>is general and abstract and is implicit in the images.</u>

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are some ideas the founding fathers took from the Enlightenment philosophers of Locke, Hobbes, Rosseau and Montesquieu?

julsineya [31]

Answer:

The Answer Is in the Explanation Below

Explanation:

These thinkers valued reason, science, religious tolerance, and what they called “natural rights”—life, liberty, and property. Enlightenment philosophers John Locke, Charles Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all developed theories of government in which some or even all the people would govern.

7 0

2 years ago