According to Gibbons v. Ogden, a state <u>can not interfere with the power of congress to regulate commerce.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
The case of Gibbons and the Ogden was presented in the Supreme Court in the United States of America. It was in the year 1824 and was one of the most important cases of that time.
According to this case, a principle was established and it established a legislative enactment. According to this, a state could not interfere in the power of the congress and the power that was talked about in this principle was about interfering with the regulation of the commerce. It was only in the hand of the congress and not with the states.
Answer:
SO basically yeah ik its so easy cmon u got thsi
Explanation:
The "Reign of Terror" is associated with France, since this describes the period of time shortly after the French Revolution, during which thousands of people were murdered.
Answer:
The Programme of Action called on the ANC to embark on mass action, involving civil disobedience, strikes, boycotts and other forms of non-violent resistance, similar to the 1946 Passive resistance campaign mounted by the South African Indian Conference (SAIC).
Explanation:
The answer to this question is going to be option "A" or "To force Soviet troops out of Afghanistan and destroy their supporters". Since the Soviet invasion was a fail, it helped unite potential supporters of the Al Qaeda movement. I hope my answer has helped you.. good day to you..
