Well, Since God(Jesus) only has the power to know the future, and because it is impossible for man to do this alone, you would have to depend on God for prophetic things, such as dreams and stuff like that. But there is such a false thing called a "false prophet." False prophets are not actually real prophets, but instead fakers, who spread lies about "Upcoming events". So in order to become a prophet, you must have a connection with God, which will allow for the communication between the two of you. (Like a relationship). Now the Bible makes it clear how you can get to God. ((keep in mind that there is noting you can do to earn anything from God, religion will not help you and you are not perfect)) It says it here, in John 14:6 " <span>Jesus said to him, </span><span>“I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me"
</span>
so really, the word religion is a biblical word, which means the Bible(and God) has the right to define it! Religion is trying to earn/work your way towards God. Which is extremely difficult, and for this task you would need something to keep you on track. but lets be honest, your not perfect. So God did everything for you, and he offers everything freely only because he loves us, and your greatest purpose in found in him. whatever its a prophet, r whatever is good, remember all of this comes from God!
Answer:
those employed solely in agriculture
First, Zinn makes it clear that Columbus and his Spanish backers were motivated primarily by a desire to discover new sources of wealth. This explains their approach to dealing with the native peoples they encountered. As Zinn says, “The information that Columbus wanted most [from the natives] was: ‘Where is the gold?'” The second point would be his description of the effects of the policies of Columbus and the Spanish officials that followed him to the Caribbean. They led to the almost total extermination of the native peoples who inhabited the region. The famous account by Bartolome de Las Casas is cited to make this point all the more clear. The final three points are really related to historiography, and the uses of the past, and serve to set up the main thrust of Zinn’s overall narrative. First he shows that previous historians of Columbus’s actions in the New World such as Samuel Eliot Morison have effaced the unflattering parts, and that this has been deliberate: “the historian’s distortion…is ideological; it is released into a world of contending interests, where any chosen emphasis supports…some kind of interest.” This leads to his next point, which is that the “quiet acceptance of conquest and murder in the name of progress” has disturbing effects in our own time, making it easier for us to countenance the bad things people do with power today. Finally, Zinn argues that the whitewashing of history and celebration of the actions of men like Columbus is part of a larger historical approach that is told from the “point of view of governments, conquerors, diplomats,” and other powerful men. Zinn proposes a different approach, one which he will pursue in A People’s History, that focuses on people from the “bottom up.” So the aim of his treatment of Columbus is as much to set up his overall narrative approach as to tell an unimportant, or unfamiliar story about the man.
Zinn wrote that, "we must not accept the memory of states as our own. Nations are not communities and never have been." Also, he writes, "I don't want to romanticize them." He says he's blunt about the history and doesn't act like, for example, Columbus killed a bunch of people, but, oh, he was a hero! And, "I don't want to invent victories for people's movements."
I'm not totally sure about this one but it sounds like symptoms of borderline personality disorder. Hope I could help.
The head lamp has a balanced force.
The book has a balanced force.
The car has a balanced force.
The clock doesn't have a balanced force.
The ball has a balanced force.
The bicycle doesn't have a balanced force.
The air jet has a balanced force.
The boat doesn't have a balanced force.
The teddy bear doesn't have a balanced force.
