No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>
</span>
<span>Spain in the 1500s, when they traded with the Native Americans some play toys....</span>
Explanation:
The statue of Aulus Metellus offers us a glimpse of the changing socio-political landscape of the Italian peninsula during the latter first millennium B.C.E. He is posed as an orator,highlighting his political career as both Etruscan and Roman aristocrats did.
Great Britain. They were forced to pay
Hope this helps
