C) But even this is admitting more than is true, for I answer roundly, that America would have flourished as much, and probably much more, had no European power had any thing to do with her.
In Option C, Paine is stating that America would actually have been better off if it was not controlled by Britain. He says that being under British control actually hindered America's progress and kept it from flourishing even more. Options A and B both give arguments for America needing Britain in order to thrive. In Option A it states that a connection with Britain is important for America to maintain its happiness. In Option B it compares America to a child. It states that if a child can survive on milk alone then it should never have meat. Therefore America should only need Britain. We can tell Paine sees this as preposterous, but this initial idea does not support the claim. Option D shows how America will always have commerce but Britain is only concerned with eating. This alone is not enough for strong evidence.
Answer:
Videos are NOT always a primary source for information. This is because anyone can make a video and post it online, but not everyone is an expert. A primary source should usually be from an expert in that field.
Explanation:
May I have brainliest please? :)
The correct answer is A. Nonfiction writers are more often free to move about in time and space.
B is not correct because that is usually the characteristic of nonfiction, rather than fiction. C is incorrect because usually writers of fiction can embellish the facts because they are not based on actual information. D is incorrect because sometimes writers of nonfiction can express their passionate opinions, especially in essays.
