They believed that they had the same say as men and that their opinions matter. They thought they deserved a voice in creating their society too.
Answer:
The Camp David Accords were a pair of political agreements signed by President Jimmy Carter, Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in September 1978.
Explanation:
The accords established a framework for peace between the two countries and in the Middle East.
The question which both John Maynard Keynes and Karl Marx would agree most about would be D. Do free-market economies create problems for workers?
<h3>What is a Free Market?</h3>
This refers to the economic system where there is limited government interference and price is determined by private businesses.
Hence, we can see that based on the economic views of both Keyes and Marx, they both questioned capitalist production and they would likely ask the question in option D because it would show how efficient it is for workers.
Read more about Karl Marx here:
brainly.com/question/17266755
#SPJ1
Answer:
Pros :
You had the possibility to help people rather directly as there were more little towns.
People were much more receptive to your preaches. You had a rather large freedom of speech especially if you were a bishop. (This is not in middle ages but the priest that lead Louis XIV burial mass said in his preach “Only God is great !” (Implicitly saying that the king was a standart man that was confronted to the same necessity than other people).
You had access to a good education (and to some boos, what was rather scarce before the XVIth century) hence, you were one of the few litterate persons allowing you to teach people how to read and write. You could have an intellectual influence and a social influence by teaching the local lord’s children how to read and sometimes give political pieces of advice to the local lord.
You could yourself be a local lord as bishop / head of an abbey.
You could be the head of a local charity (origin of hospitals).
In France you didn’t pay taxes. On the contrary, you received one tenth of peasants’ crops.
If you were an eminent bishop / cardinal, or if you were the Pope you could have tremendous spiritual and political power.
You could get married while being a catholic priest (before the XIIth century, before 1123 precisely).
Cons :
You could be obliged to condemn people because they didn’t believe in God - help the Inquisition.
You had to help / discuss with people that were sentenced to death what should have been very difficult on a psychological point of view.
You couldn’t get married after the XIIth century (after 1123).
You could be seen with envy considering your privileges.
Explanation:
found it online
It is said that all the philosophy and knowledge used during the Renaissance era was held onto the Scoentific Revolution.
