Answer:
Because his works are worthy of being read, even 400 years after being written!
Explanation:
"Like other settled, agrarian societies in history, those in the Indian subcontinent have been attacked by nomadic tribes throughout its long history. In evaluating the impact of Islam on the sub-continent, one must note that the northwestern sub-continent was a frequent target of tribes raiding from Central Asia. In that sense, the Muslim intrusions and later Muslim invasions were not dissimilar to those of the earlier invasions during the 1st millennium."
<span>Richard M. Frye, "Pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Cultures in Central Asia", in </span>Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective<span>, ed. Robert L. Canfield (Cambridge U. Press c. 1991), 35–53.</span>"
So, MUSLIMS is the answer, does it have this option?
The one reason why nationalism in arab countries spread in the Middle East during and after World War 1 was :
<em>(C) Arabs in the region wanted to gain independence from the Turkish leaders of the Ottoman Empire.</em>
The Ottoman Empire’s entry into the First World War in November 1914 provided the final spark for outright revolt.The British, through their control of Egypt and the port of Aden at the entrance to the Red Sea, were reasonably well informed about the unrest brewing in Ottoman Arabia.In fact, just before the war broke out, Sharif Hussein ibn Ali sent one of his sons, Emir Abdullah ibn Hussein, on a secret mission to Egypt to contact the British military commander-in-chief there, Lord Kitchener. What support, if any, could he expect from the British if he rebelled against his Ottoman overlords?The response was cautious and qualified, but not discouraging. When war came the British quickly positioned themselves as the principal backers of the Hashemite cause.
Answer:
B: A government corporation.
Explanation:
