The reason why the Midwestern United States have a very fertile soil, but Canada doesn't, despite both of them being covered by glaciers until relatively recently, and both having the same age of soil, is the climate and vegetation.
Canada is much colder than the Midwest, its winters are longer, and the summers mild, while the Midwest has higher temperatures, prolonged period of drought, and seasonal rainfall.
Because of this, Canada has been covered by coniferous forests. They leave relatively little biomass, and also the climate is making the decomposition of the biomass very slow, thus resulting in relatively poor soil quality.
In the Midwest, the climate is perfect for the development of the grasslands. The grasses grown and die each year. They live a lot of biomass, and the higher temperatures contribute that the biomass decomposes pretty quickly, thus resulting in good quality soil.
No. There are to many people in the world with different political views for everyone to have one common mind set
Supporting points are:
Help the disadvantaged,support the underdeveloped nations humanitarian departments such as health and security,help integrate the people into the global economy, especially through educational initiative.It is in line with the moral majority, and christian doctrines of humanity.Can help eradicate human rights abuses as aid is tied to such demands
AgainstMost of the funds get into a few african elites hands anyway Redirecting tax payers money into other nation is morally wrong.It defeats the essence of rationality, as the country gets little benefit by giving out the aid.
There is a strong belief among the hindu majority that harm cannot come to such a sacred river.
