The evidence that the author used to support faulty analogy in the text is <u>some people talk to their plants to help them grow</u>
According to the excerpt, the narrator talks about plants and hamsters and their similarities and differences. He deceptively compares them by saying that a hamster requires attention from its owner, usually by talking, but plants cando fine without needing anybody to talk to them.
Faulty analogy is a type of fallacy that makes use of deceptive comparisons to attempt to prove a point.
Therefore, the evidence that the author used to support faulty analogy in the text is <u>some people talk to their plants to help them grow</u>
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/4025909
1. Pick a topic
2. pick a hook (something that will draw attention and make people want to read it)
3. Expand on your hook and make sure to clearly state your view on the topic (if it is good or bad, if you should or shouldn't get it-- so on )
4. write 3-5 body paragraphs.
- your view
- positive aspects
- negitive aspects
- compare the negitive and positive aspects
5. sum it all up in a conclusion paragraph
6. works cited page (all your links)
if u need a website for citation easybib is a rlly good one
Answer:
to inform readers about the history of Rome and Sparta and how they built their empires
Answer:
Misunderstanding/miscommunication
Explanation:
Well if you both speak different languages, it would be hard to communicate, leading to misunderstandings or just not understanding at all.
