Answer:
Explanation:
To maximize profit, you would charge $8 for an adult's ticket and $4 for a child?s ticket. Total profit in this case would be $800.
The city council passes a law prohibiting you from charging different prices to different customers.
Now you set a price of $8 for all tickets, resulting in $600 in profit.
Indicate whether each of the following groups of people is better off, worse off, or the same because of the law prohibiting price discrimination.
Groups of People Better Off Worse Off Unchanged
Adults x
Children x
You, the Producer x
Suppose the fixed cost of the play were $2,600 rather than $2,000.
Complete the following sentences indicating how this would change your answers to the previous parts.
In the presence of price discrimination, the adult price of a ticket would remain the same, and the child price would remain the same. Total profit would fall to $200.
If price discrimination were banned and the monopolist continued to produce the play no matter what the profit, the price of a ticket would remain the same, and total profit would fall to $0.
Answer:
Demand.
Explanation:
Population of household composition, price of real estate in the area, availability of mortgage credit, consumer tastes, and income of consumers are all indicators of demand.
Demand can be defined as an economic principle which involves the willingness of a customer to pay an amount of money (price) for a desired goods or services it need or requires.
Simply stated, demand for goods and services rest solely upon the consumer of such goods and services.
Candy land the bored game is cool
The answer is settling on morally revise business choices.
Answer:
The CPA rebuts the allegations
Explanation:
The Securities Act of 1933 requires that investors receive financial and other significant information regarding any and all securities being sold publicly and prohibits deceit, misrepresentations, and other fraud in the sale of securities. Therefore, since there was material misstatement or omission in the financial statements, the only chance the CPA has is if they rebut the allegations. Meaning that they provide actual evidence, such as physical statements or witnesses that contradict or nullify the evidence that is being presented against them regarding the material misstatement or omission
