Explain the meaning behind the term Pax Romana.

History

2 answers:

Hitman42 [59]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The term "Pax Romana," which literally means "Roman peace," refers to the time period from 27 B.C.E. to 180 C.E. in the Roman Empire. This 200-year period saw unprecedented peace and economic prosperity throughout the Empire, which spanned from England in the north to Morocco in the south and Iraq in the east. During the Pax Romana, the Roman Empire reached its peak in terms of land area, and its population swelled to an estimated 70 million people. Nevertheless, Rome's citizens were relatively secure, and the government generally maintained law, order, and stability. The Pax Romana began when Octavian became the leader of the Roman Empire.

ryzh [129]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The term "Pax Romana," which literally means "Roman peace," refers to the time period from 27 B.C.E to 180 C.E in the Roman Empire. This 200-year period saw unprecedented peace and economic prosperity throughout the Empire, which spanned from England in the north to Morocco in the south and Iraq in the east.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Important people involved in the camp meeting engraving

hammer [34]

Answer:

Barton W. stone, Alexander Campbell, and Richard Allen. Many participants were women because the second great awaking was focused on women's rights.

6 0

3 years ago

The economic prosperity of the middle class in the united states directly after world war ii led to the

Alex Ar [27]

Go here it has all your answers https://quizlet.com/76254856/us-history-ii-chapter-26-flash-cards/

3 0

3 years ago

PLZZ HELP!! (50 pts)

JulsSmile [24]

Mr. Justice Jackson, dissenting. . . .

Much is said of the danger to liberty from the Army program for deporting and detaining these citizens of Japanese extraction. But a judicial construction of the due process clause that will sustain this order is a far more subtle blow to liberty than the promulgation of the order itself. A military order, however unconstitutional, is not apt to last longer than the military emergency. Even during that period a succeeding commander may revoke it all. But once a judicial opinion rationalizes such an order to show that it conforms to the Constitution, or rather rationalizes the Constitution to show that the Constitution sanctions such an order, the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination in criminal procedure and of transplanting American citizens. . . . A military commander may overstep the bounds of constitutionality, and it is an incident. But if we review and approve, that passing incident becomes the doctrine of the Constitution. There it has a generative power of its own, and all that it creates will be in its own image. Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Court’s opinion in this case. . . .

yes i copy and pasted but this is your answer

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What do you think was the purpose of publicizing the before and after photos of native children?

Tamiku [17]

happiness n sweet memories collect by the picture...

4 0

3 years ago

What conflict did Naomi face and how did she cope with it? Why did she want Ruth and Orpah to go back to Moab? And how did she r

Troyanec [42]

Answer: The conflict Naomi faced was the death of her husband and Son-in-laws. She didn't really move on to marrying another husband because it wasn't recorded but what is known is that she returned to Bethlehem because of famine she faced in Moab.

Explanation:

The conflict Naomi faced was the death of her husband and Son-in-laws. She didn't really move on to marrying another husband because it wasn't recorded but what is known is that she returned to Bethlehem because of famine she faced in Moab.

She urged her daughter-in-laws to go back due to she had no more sons they could get married to, so there was no need for them to keep following her, she advised them to return to Moab and marry again.

She couldn't persuade Ruth. Ruth insisted and followed her to Bethlehem.

8 0

2 years ago