Which statements accurately describe arguments made against President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003?

History

2 answers:

max2010maxim [7]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

B) Invading Iraq would divert attention and resources from the goal of destroying Al-Qaeda.

C) UN inspectors needed more time to determine if Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

Explanation:

PLEASE CHOOSE ME AS BRAINLIEST :)

Radda [10]3 years ago

5 0

Answer: The answers to your question would be B and C. The statements that accurately describe arguments made against President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003 were that invading Iraq would divert attention and resources from the goal of destroying Al-Qaeda, and that the UN inspectors needed more time to determine if Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

Explanation:

Please give brainliest if this helped! :) Have a good day!

You might be interested in

Why was the power to declare war given to the national government and not the state government?

Ket [755]

Answer:

Explanation:

Each state may choose differently on whether to go to war or not.

There would also not be enough funding. The funding would have to come from the federal government.

7 0

3 years ago

What did the British empire gain

Cloud [144]

Answer:

Gold and Diamonds :)

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Movement and Migration word bank pls help fast I WILL GIVE U BRAINLEST

Oksanka [162]

Answer:

Migration is the movement of either people or animals from one area to another. Look up in the trees, where you might see a Monarch butterfly make a stop on its migration to Mexico. Migration can be used for the journey from one place to another or for the act of movement.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

3. What was Jackson’s stance on federal government power in regards to the Tariff of 1824?

romanna [79]

Jackson’s stance on federal government power in regards to the Tariff of 1824 was that the power of the federal government superseded that of the states. Jackson was a nationalist who believed in the federal union and the need to preserve it. As a result, he was a proponent of a stronger federal government.

7 0

3 years ago

Why was South Carolina targeted for terrible damage by Union troops?

Art [367]

During Grant's war of attrition, the Union army stayed on the offensive. ... Why was South Carolina targeted for terrible damage by Union troops? -It housed the only army left. -It was the first state to secede.

8 0

4 years ago