B. Sometimes we must interfere. When human lives are endangered, when human dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivities become irrelevant.
Elie wiesels is a survivor of the holocaust that lived the terror of the WWII and his main idea on the Nobel prize acceptance speech was that when we see atrocities happen to our neighbor we have to come off our way to help him.
Http://www.shmoop.com/hunger-games/chapter-6-summary.html
Answer:
here are just some good points that you could make
-civilians would think about the greater good of the people, they are the people so they want things that would benefeit and not hurt them
-a country under the rule of the military is more likely to be oppressed, the military contains all the power and if the military has rule over its civilians, then the civilians are helpless so they would fall under oppression
-there is no one ruler (dictatorship) : with civilians you would most likely have a majority vote or opinion of many but with the military soldiers are trained to take orders from one person that leads them
-
Explanation:
hope this helps :)