Answer:
You would use <em>was</em>.
Explanation:
Using "were" in this sense, while it <em>is</em> past tense, doesn't make sense. It is not grammatically correct. If you notice "lunch" is not plural, meaning "were" would not fit it. You would use "was" for it to be grammatically correct.
Here's what the sentence would look like if you used <em>were</em>: "Lunches for the guests were prepared yesterday."
If you were to use "was", the sentence would be: "Lunch for the guests was prepared yesterday.", because the "lunch" is singular. Making <u>this</u> the correct sentence.
I hope this helps!
(Sorry for the mess up!)
-No one
My answer would be instruction or guideline.
Answer:
New words are added to our social language frequently.
Explanation:
According to the write-up, new words are an important aspect of social language and because of this, they are used so often and become part of our speech and everyday usage.
Scholars who update the dictionary every year add these new words to the annual edition of the dictionary. The central idea of the paragraph is that new words are added to our social language frequently
Answer:
Yes that's true it isn't a complete thought
